The Conditions for Achieving the Private Copy of Protected Works in Jordanian Law
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The narrow-mindedness towards the full authority of the writer and using sources without consent which is crime secured by the law; while not accepting the chief aspects has been an specific exclusion of cerebral workbooks according to Jordanian copyright protection law the authorities of Jordan restricted author began psychologically, taking advantages of others while applying this separation or to cling the terminology of this exemption. To become the advantageous of an exemption with own description regarding permissible official exemption which permits one from asking the permission of the author. Either one would be able to get a copy of his work or the description award officially would transform into forbidden restriction. The accomplishment of the personal description is connected to the recognition of the certified private version, which makes it mandatory for the copyist that the private copy of the protected work by the copyist must be kept one copy for his use and the process is done by him or others. Key words: Private copy; Protected works; Copyrights; Jordanian legislations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".