MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1672780339

Member wellness -- the art of maintaining your sanity.

2012· editorial· en· W1672780339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jim Fairles

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSanitySummitPsychologyPsychiatryCriminologyMedicinePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It’s September as I write this. Summer holidays are over and “life” begins to happen again in earnest. A multitude of commitments begins to pile up. It seems like the issues and crises will never end. How do we cope? How do we prevent burnout? At the CVMA convention in July we explored some of these issues at the Summit of Veterinary Leaders forum. The topics of burnout and suicide are long overdue as national discussion points. It has certainly been a difficult area for me to discuss. As a male of the baby boomer generation, we were expected to be strong, and the idea that mental health issues were for others was deeply ingrained in us. Truth be told, in hindsight I was constantly bumping up against the issues of mental health throughout my career. How did I avoid any serious consequences? That is a good question. Health Canada statistics from 2002 indicate that 1 in 5 Canadians will experience a mental illness in their lifetime. The remaining 4 will have a friend, family member or colleague who will. I certainly can relate — a classmate who disappeared for days at a time, a classmate who committed suicide, a family member’s addiction and mental health issues, and more recently, a serious accident and brush with mental health concerns myself. Recent articles and discussions have continued to emphasize the growing issue of mental health issues and suicide in the veterinary profession (1–7). One such article from the United Kingdom (2) by Bartram and Baldwin states, “Veterinary surgeons have a proportional mortality ratio (PMR) for suicide approximately 4 times that of the general population and around twice that of other healthcare professions.” From an article from Australia in 2008 (4); “The estimated suicide rates for western Australian and Victorian veterinarians were respectively 4.0 times and 3.8 times the standardized rate for suicide in the respective state adult populations.” These statistics are alarming indeed. The national member wellness survey conducted by the CVMA this spring showed just how serious these issues are in Canada. (The CVMA gratefully acknowledges the Association des medecins veterinaires du Quebec en practique des petits animaux for the use of its survey template.) With a 20% response rate there were several interesting and surprising findings. This is by no means a statistically valid survey but the general response tallies are quite alarming even considering that those affected by issues would be the most interested in responding. Do you believe that you have suffered burnout in the past? 51% yes Have you had burnout confirmed by physician/psychiatrist? 12% yes Is your profession a major contributing factor of your burnout? 90% yes For more detailed information on the survey have a look at the article found in the news section of this issue entitled “Wellness of Veterinarians: CVMA National Survey Results” on page 1159. Some provinces have developed safety nets and/or piggy backed on existing professional support programs. I am most familiar with the Ontario situation and the Professionals Health Program (PHP). These and other help lines and support services are available for those who need support or are in a crisis situation. How do we develop the tools to prevent us from getting this far? Other countries have expressed concerns as well, have undertaken research and are attempting to address the issues, particularly Great Britain with Vetlife, and Australia with Vet Health. Through discussions with those administering the Australian program the concept of resiliency was raised. How resilient are we to the stress and strain of everyday practice and life? Do we have the tools necessary to be able to cope and bounce back from mental health issues? Over the course of the next year, this issue will be discussed at the CVMA Council table. We must answer some basic questions about this topic and I invite you to share your opinion, starting with — should we get involved? And if so How should we get involved? Are there any current resources that we can make available to members? How should we fund these endeavors? Is a benevolent fund or foundation a viable option for funding for those in distress? The most recent article from the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges by Skipper and Williams (7) provides a serious call to action: “There is a critical need for action. For action to be effective, it clearly needs to be undertaken with the involvement of all of the agencies concerned with veterinary medicine, including the Student Chapter of the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Association of Veterinary State Boards, the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges, and the American Veterinary Medical Association, if this ticking time-bomb is to be defused.” To me it is obvious that the respective Canadian organizations must be involved as well. As suggested in my previous editorial — please make your opinions heard, either to the CVMA (gro.vmca-amvc@nimda) or to me directly (www.skyvet.com, moc.tevyks@mij or gro.vmca-amvc@tnediserpamvc) Stay calm! Stay well!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207