Resilience and Vulnerability: Complementary or Conflicting Concepts?
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Abstract
Miller, F., H. Osbahr, E. Boyd, F. Thomalla, S. Bharwani, G. Ziervogel, B. Walker, J. Birkmann, S. Van der Leeuw, J. Rockström, J. Hinkel, T. Downing, C. Folke, and D. Nelson 2010. Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts?. Ecology and Society 15(3): 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03378-150311
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Topic
- Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Field
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Vulnerability (computing)Resilience (materials science)MillerEnvironmental ethicsEcologySociologyGeographyHumanitiesPhilosophyBiologyComputer sciencePhysicsComputer security
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes