Peak to Average Power Ratio Properties of MC-CDMA and SM-CDMA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper compares peak to average power ratio (PAPR) of multi carrier code division multiple access (MC-CDMA) and serial modulation-CDMA (SM-CDMA) with each other and with corresponding non-spread spectrum techniques which are orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and serial modulation (SM). In this comparison we consider the effect of two spreading types- binary and complex spreading, and equal-level and multi-level constellation on the amplitude distribution and out-of-band radiation. While MC-CDMA and OFDM have similar amplitude distribution, we show that the PAPR of SM-CDMA can be larger than that of SM. If the spreading is binary and the constellation is multi-level, this effect is so powerful that the PAPR of SM-CDMA becomes similar to that of MC-CDMA. Finally we use a modified selected mapping (SLM) algorithm to decrease the PAPR of SM-CDMA so that it would be equal to that of SM. Therefore SM-CDMA has lower PAPR if we use it together with modified SLM, and the system will need amplifiers with lower power back-off values
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it