MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W167327011

A Strategic Planning Approach to Technology Integration: Critical Success Factors.

2002· article· en· W167327011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel Shaw, Jeff Zabudsky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInformation Technology Governance and Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrategic planningInformation technologyWork (physics)IdentifierEducational technologyTelecommunicationsEngineering managementLibrary sciencePolitical scienceBusinessSociologyComputer scienceEngineeringMarketingPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AUTHOR Shaw, Sam; Zabudsky, Jeff TITLE A Strategic Planning Approach to Technology Integration: Critical Success Factors. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 11p.; In: Proceedings of the Pacific Telecommunications Council (PTC) Conference Next Generation Communications: Making IT Work (24th, Honolulu, Hawaii, January 13-17, 2002); see IR 021 116. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Computer Mediated Communication; *Computer Uses in Education; Educational Planning; *Educational Technology; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Information Technology; *Strategic Planning; *Technology Integration; Telecommunications IDENTIFIERS Alberta; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology; *Technology Implementation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInformation Technology Governance and StrategyFrench-language works237,207