Application of Concurrency in the Asynchronous Design of Write-after-read Operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces enhancements to the synthesis of circuits that involve write-afterread (WAR) operations and use the four-phase handshake protocol. The paper demonstrates that the use of edge-triggering makes possible many useful trade-offs among speed, area and powerdelay product. Significant increases in speed are possible as a result of increased concurrency in the circuit's operation, which compensates for much of the penalty associated with the down phase of the four-phase protocol. It is also shown that concurrency can be increased by the judicious insertion of T-elements in the system's control structure. Simulation results for a 16-bit accumulator showed a speed increase of 50% and a reduction of 23% in the power-delay product. The speed of a radix-4 Booth multiplier increased by over 27% and its area and energy consumption were reduced by 5%. These results were derived using test circuits synthesized by Balsa and implemented in Synopsys using 180-nm technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".