MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1673794382 · doi:10.1109/pesw.2001.917219

Simultaneous inter-area decoupling and local area damping by voltage source HVDC

2002· article· en· W1673794382 on OpenAlexaff
Weixing Lu, B.T. Ooi

Bibliographic record

Venue2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoupling (probability)Control theory (sociology)Voltage sourceVoltageDeltaAC powerPerturbation (astronomy)PhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceControl (management)Control engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The voltage-source converter (VSC) has 2 independent control degrees of freedom over P and Q (or P and V). Thus a high voltage DC (HVDC) transmission link based on VSCs (VSC HVDC) has 4 steady-state control freedoms. Of these, 2 are devoted to specifying and to coordinating the real power P through the DC link. This leaves one control freedom at each converter station to control the reactive power Q. Dynamically, the VSC-HVDC link has again 4 control freedoms based on the perturbation variables /spl Delta/P and /spl Delta/Q (or /spl Delta/P and /spl Delta/V). Through digital simulations, this paper shows that the two /spl Delta/Ps can de-couple the inter-area modes and each /spl Delta/V (or /spl Delta/Q) can simultaneously damp local modes within the area in which the converter station is situated. A mathematical proof for these capabilities is given in an appendix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207