MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1673974905 · doi:10.1109/tsipn.2015.2476695

No-Reference Transmission Distortion Modelling for H.264/AVC-Coded Video

2015· article· en· W1673974905 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Uzair, R.D. Dony

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMotion compensationRate–distortion optimizationDistortion (music)AlgorithmData compressionCoding (social sciences)Reference frameVideo qualityScalable Video CodingBlock-matching algorithmReal-time computingComputer visionFrame (networking)Video trackingBandwidth (computing)Video processingTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a low-complexity No-reference algorithm for real-time estimation of the channel induced distortion is proposed. The algorithm is capable of providing video quality evaluation for the network service provider perspective to the end-user. An analytical model has been proposed to estimate the mean square error (mse) distortion at the MB, frame, and sequence level. The algorithm takes into account the spatiotemporal dynamics of the video sequence. The transmission distortion is estimated because of the spatial and temporal error concealment, along with the effects of temporal propagation distortion due to the motion compensation. The algorithm is capable of measuring the transmission distortion for video sequence encoded as I, P, and B frames, as compared to most of the proposed algorithms which are not capable of working with B frames at all. However, the bandwidth-constrained resource networks make compression very important, which is not possible without B frames. The proposed algorithm is experimentally tested and validated with video signals encoded according to the H.264/AVC video coding standard. A novel experimental setup is established to simulate the video traffic and simulation results show that the proposed algorithm shows better results as compared to other proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over NetworksSame topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207