MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1673999527 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.170.8.4111

IL-21 Induces the Apoptosis of Resting and Activated Primary B Cells

2003· article· en· W1673999527 on OpenAlexaff
Devangi Mehta, Andrea L. Wurster, Matthew J. Whitters, Deborah Young, Mary Collins, Michael J. Grusby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsApoptosisCell biologyCD40BiologyHomeostasisCytokineChemistryImmunologyCytotoxic T cellIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytokines play an important role in regulating the development and homeostasis of B cells by controlling their viability. In this study, we show that the recently described T cell-derived cytokine IL-21 induces the apoptosis of resting primary murine B cells. In addition, the activation of primary B cells with IL-4, LPS, or anti-CD40 Ab does not prevent IL-21-mediated apoptosis. The induction of apoptosis by IL-21 correlates with a down-regulation in the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-x(L), two antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family. Furthermore, the reconstitution of Bcl-x(L) or Bcl-2 expression protects primary B cells from IL-21-induced apoptosis. In addition, a short-term preactivation of B cells with anti-CD40 Ab confers protection from IL-21-mediated apoptosis through the up-regulation of Bcl-x(L). These studies reveal a novel pathway that mediates B cell apoptosis via the IL-21R and suggest that IL-21 may play a role in regulating B cell homeostasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations198
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207