MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1674330744 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.131801

Fourth Generation<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math>Violation Effects on<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math>, and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math>in Next-to-Leading-Order Perturbative QCD

2007· article· lv· W1674330744 on OpenAlexaff
W.-S. Hou, Hsiang-nan Li, Satoshi Mishima, Makiko Nagashima

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsElectroweak interactionAmplitudeQuantum chromodynamicsCP violationFormalism (music)B mesonQuarkOrder (exchange)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the effect from a sequential fourth generation quark on penguin-dominated two-body nonleptonic $B$ meson decays in the next-to-leading order perturbative QCD formalism. With an enhancement of the color-suppressed tree amplitude and possibility of a new $CP$ phase in the electroweak penguin amplitude, we can account better for ${A}_{CP}({B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}})\ensuremath{-}{A}_{CP}({B}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0})$. Taking $|{V}_{{t}^{\ensuremath{'}}s}{V}_{{t}^{\ensuremath{'}}b}|\ensuremath{\sim}0.02$ with a phase just below 90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, which is consistent with the $b\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ rate and the ${B}_{s}$ mixing parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}{m}_{{B}_{s}}$, we find a downward shift in the mixing-induced $CP$ asymmetries of ${B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}_{S}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ and $\ensuremath{\phi}{K}_{S}$. The predicted behavior for ${B}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\rho}}^{0}{K}_{S}$ is opposite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0070.007
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207