MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W167441776

Critical steps in hematogenous metastasis: an overview.

2001· article· en· W167441776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer FoundationWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetastasisCancerCancer researchMicrometastasisCancer metastasisOncologyPathologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metastasis is responsible for most cancer deaths. A better understanding of the process provides opportunities to develop new treatments to prevent metastasis. This article summarizes findings from experimental in vivo videomicroscopy and quantitative studies on metastatic inefficiency, which indicate that early steps in hematogenous metastasis may be quite efficient, but that regulation of cancer cell growth in secondary sites determines metastatic outcome. The authors have identified three key stages of this growth regulation: survival of a subset of single cells, proliferation of a subset of these cells to form preangiogenic micrometastases, and persistence of growth of a subset of these to form vascularized metastases. Formation of clinically relevant metastases is determined by the proportion of cells that proceeds successfully through each stage, and surviving single cells and preangiogenic micrometastases both represent possible sources of tumor dormancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it