MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1674754561

De las Voluntades Anticipadas o Instrucciones Previas a la Planificación Anticipada de las Decisiones

2004· article· es· W1674754561 on OpenAlex
Inés María Barrio Cantalejo, Pablo Simón Lorda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCartographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir del año 2000 se ha producido en España un gran desarrollo legislativo sobre los documentos de voluntades anticipadas o instrucciones previas. La experiencia norteamericana, estadounidense sobre todo, en torno a estos documentos es mucho más dilatada, pues comienza en los años 60. Con el objeto de aprender los aciertos y errores detectados en esa experiencia, se revisan algunos de sus hitos más importantes: la evolución en el diseño de los documentos, el impacto de la Ley federal ""Patient Self-Determination Act"" y la influencia del estudio SUPPORT. Además se expone la aparición, a partir de 1995, del nuevo enfoque en la utilización de las voluntades anticipadas denominado ""Planificación Anticipada de las decisiones"", y del impacto que tiene en su desarrollo el auge de la investigación con metodología cualitativa. Finalmente se realizan propuestas para la introducción de la Planificación anticipada en nuestro país. Abstract Since 2000 a great amount of legal norms about advance directives documents has been developed in Spain. In this topic the experience of countries as USA and Canada is much longer, starting in the 60´s. It is important to learn pros and cons about advance directives that North American countries have discovered in this long time. With this objective, we review in this paper the evolution of the living wills documents, the impact of the Patient Self - Determination Act and the influence of the SUPPORT study. In addition we review the Advance Care Planning, the current orientation (since 1995) of the advance directives, and the role of qualitative investigation in its implementation. Finally, the state of the art in Spain and some proposals for the implementation of Advance Care Planning in our country, are outlined. Centro de Trabajo: Nodo de Ética de la Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cuidados a Personas Mayores (RIMARED) Fecha del Trabajo: 15/02/2004 Palabra Clave: Voluntades anticipadas, instrucciones previas, toma de decisiones, consentimiento informado, legislación. Key Words: Living wills, advance directives, advance care planning, durable power of attorney, SUPPORT, Patient Self-Determination Act

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.431
GPT teacher head0.635
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it