Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The determination of physiologic lower limb functional imbalance among healthy teenagers is important to follow the rehabilitation progress and return to normal activity of injured subjects. We investigated the differences in vertical jump capacity between both legs in a group of healthy boys and girls, considering the performances in the dominant vs. non-dominant, and in the most vs. least efficient leg. Strength and power performances were compared in 117 boys and 106 girls aged 10-16 years during a single-leg vertical countermovement jump (SLVCJ) test. When leg dominance was defined subjectively by the participant, no difference was noted between the 2 legs. Statistically significant differences were recorded between the most and less efficient leg in strength and power performances for both genders. Girls had significantly greater peak strength than did age-matched boys, but boys showed significant increases in maximal power outputs compared with that shown by age-matched girls. When the results were analyzed according to the percentage of participants falling within certain bands of limb asymmetry, approximately 20-30% showed a difference of >15% between the 2 limbs without any relation to gender. Subjective expression of leg dominance cannot be used as a predictor of SLVCJ performance. Differences of <15% in SLVCJ performance between both legs should be considered as the physiological norm in this age group. A greater appreciation of the potential diagnostic value of the SLVCJ test may be obtained if the results are interpreted in terms of the percentage of subjects falling within certain bands of limb asymmetry. Gender-based differences in the SLVCJ test vary and depend upon whether the results are interpreted in terms of strength or power output.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it