Enhancement of Sensorimotor Behavioral Recovery in Hemiparkinsonian Rats with Intrastriatal, Intranigral, and Intrasubthalamic Nucleus Dopaminergic Transplants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the critical variables that influences the efficacy of clinical neural transplantation for Parkinson's disease (PD) is optimal graft placement. The current transplantation paradigm that focuses on ectopic placement of fetal grafts in the striatum (ST) fails to reconstruct the basal ganglia circuitry or normalize neuronal activity in important basal ganglia structures, such as the substantia nigra (SN) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The aim of this study was to investigate a multitarget neural transplantation strategy for PD by assessing whether simultaneous dopaminergic transplants in the ST, SN, and STN induce functional recovery in hemiparkinsonian rats. Forty-six female Wistar rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway were randomly divided into eight groups and received lesions only or injections of 900,000 embryonic rat ventral mesencephalic cells in the (1) ST, (2) SN, (3) STN, (4) ST and SN, (5) ST, SN, and STN, (6) ST and STN, or (7) SN and STN. The number of cells transplanted was equally divided among grafting sites. Animals with two grafts received 450,000 cells in each structure, and animals with three grafts received 300,000 cells per structure. Recovery was assessed by amphetamine-induced rotations and the stepping tests. Graft survival was assessed using tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemistry. At 8 weeks after transplantation, simultaneous dopaminergic transplants in the ST, SN, and STN induced significant improvement in rotational behavior and stepping test scores. Intrastriatal transplants were associated with significant recovery of rotational asymmetry, whereas SN and STN transplants were associated with improved forelimb function scores. These results suggest that restoration of dopaminergic activity to multiple basal ganglia targets, such as the ST and SN, or the ST and STN, promotes a more complete functional recovery of complex sensorimotor behaviors. A multitarget transplant strategy aimed at optimizing dopaminergic reinnervation of the basal ganglia may be crucial in improving clinical outcomes in PD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".