MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1676140176 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v27i1.4412

Creating Able Human Beings: Social Studies Education in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, 1969 to the Present

2015· article· fr· W1676140176 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Catherine McGregor

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologySociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméAprès le transfert de responsabilité en matière d’éducation dans le nord du Canada par le gouvernement fédéral aux Territoires du Nord-Ouest (TNO) en 1969-1970, le département d’Éducation des Territoires rend, dès lors, obligatoire un programme scolaire axé sur les identités linguistiques et culturelles des élèves dénés et inuits afin de contrer les approches intentionnellement assimilatrices des écoles fédérales antérieures, pensionnats religieux ou écoles publiques. Cet article s’intéresse à l’aspect social des programmes d’études durant les trente années suivantes dans les TNO et de 1999 à 2013 pour le Nunavut. Après consultation de documents pertinents, l’auteure soutient que les programmes d’études instaurés dans le Nord durant cette période de 45 ans reposaient sur la culture autochtone (culturally responsive), mais sans grande conviction. Elle suggère également un nouveau terme « culturally founded education » à savoir une éducation authentiquement autochtone en référence à l’intégration des programmes développés par les peuples aborigènes du Nord d’après leurs propres perspectives culturelles. La conclusion propose des actions concrètes pour garantir que les programmes d’études soient en lien avec la population et préparent adéquatement les élèves à s’impliquer d’une manière significative dans le monde complexe du XXIe siècle. Abstract Upon transfer of responsibility for schooling in Canada’s north from the federal government to the Northwest Territories in 1969-70, the territorial Department of Education immediately mandated curriculum whose central focus was on Dene and Inuit students’ cultural and linguistic identities, in order to counteract the intentionally assimilationist approaches of previous federal and church residential and day schools. This article examines social studies curricula over the next 30 years in the NWT, and from 1999-2013 in Nunavut. Reviewing relevant documents, I argue that social studies curricula developed in the north during these 45 years have featured culturally responsive education, but did not accomplish this consistently. I also suggest a new term, culturally founded education, to refer to integrated curricula developed by northern Aboriginal peoples from their own cultural perspectives. The conclusion recommends future actions to ensure social studies education continues to reflect the people it serves and prepares students to make meaningful contributions in the complex world of the twenty-first century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207