MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Lithocholic acid delays yeast aging by altering mitochondrial dynamics

2012· article· en· W167617745 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vladimir I. Titorenko, Adam Beach, Michelle T. Burstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiolipinMitochondrionMitochondrial fissionmitochondrial fusionCell biologyBiologyPhosphatidylethanolamineInner mitochondrial membraneReactive oxygen speciesBiochemistryChemistryMembraneMitochondrial DNAPhosphatidylcholinePhospholipid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We found that an exogenously added bile acid called lithocholic acid (LCA) delays yeast aging and accumulates in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM). To define the mechanism by which LCA extends yeast longevity, we 1) examined how LCA influences mitochondrial proteome and lipidome; 2) investigated the effect of LCA on the composition and stoichiometry of respiratory complexes and supercomplexes in the IMM; 3) assessed how LCA affects mitochondrial oxygen consumption, membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS); 4) examined how LCA influences mitochondrial morphology and how it affects the chronology of events characteristic of age‐related, mitochondria‐controlled apoptosis; and 5) investigated the effect of LCA on the lifespans of long‐ and short‐lived mutants lacking individual components of the mitochondrial fission and fusion machines. Our findings imply that LCA delays yeast aging by increasing the level of phosphatidylserine (PS) and decreasing the levels of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and cardiolipin in the IMM. By altering the abundance of these lipid species, LCA greatly expands mitochondrial membrane cristae. In addition, LCA enhances the positive effect of PS and weakens the negative effect of PE on membrane protein machines whose activity they modulate – thereby 1) stimulating protein machines driving mitochondrial respiration, the maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS homeostasis, mitochondrial fusion, and protein synthesis in mitochondria; and 2) inhibiting protein machines promoting mitochondrial fission and mitochondria‐controlled apoptosis. Supported by NSERC of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→