L’INVOCATION DEVANT LE JUGE BELGE DE LA CONVENTION RELATIVE AUX DROITS DE L’ENFANT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notre examen de la mise en oeuvre de la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant permet de déterminer si celle-ci a des effets juridiques ou autres dans l’ordre juridique interne. Cette question se décline différemment selon le système juridique particulier à chaque pays. La Belgique fait partie du système moniste, ce qui implique l’effet direct ou l’applicabilité directe d’une convention internationale. Ceci permet d’invoquer une ou plusieurs de ses dispositions directement devant le juge belge sans qu’il ne soit nécessaire de transposer la convention en droit interne par une loi nationale. Or, l’invocation devant les tribunaux belges de la Convention relative aux droits de l’enfant n’est pas automatique ni toujours possible. La jurisprudence belge, loin d’être cohérente, a précisé quelles dispositions de la Convention peuvent être invoquées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".