MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Observation of the Strongest 5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>6</sup>5d–(5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>5</sup>5d6s+5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>6</sup>7p) Transitions in Au XI to Bi XV Ions

2001· article· fr· W1676901567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica Scripta · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsBismuthIonSpectral lineAtomic physicsWavelengthPhysicsHartree–Fock methodMaterials scienceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spectra of gold till bismuth were studied in the 90–135 Å region. Nine most intense lines belonging to the 5s25p65d–5s25p55d6s array were identified in Au XI to Bi XV ions. The 5s25p67p 2P3/2,1/2 levels in Au XI and the 5s25p67p 2P3/2 level in Hg XII were also identified. The observed wavelengths and intensities agree quite well with the Hartree–Fock calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it