MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1677136288 · doi:10.1063/1.1901647

Multi-focus Beam Formation And Beam Steering Using An Acoustic Lens And Lens Rotation To Create Large Lesions In Ultrasound Thermal Therapy

2005· article· en· W1677136288 on OpenAlexaff
Xia Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)TransducerBeam (structure)Focus (optics)UltrasoundOpticsMaterials scienceRotation (mathematics)Beam steeringFocused ultrasoundThermalAcousticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel multi‐focus acoustic lens transducer system was developed for ultrasound thermal therapy. The lens was used to both form multiple foci and steer the foci off the beam axis. During heating, the lens was rotated continuously around the beam axis and large thermal lesions could be formed. This novel heating applicator design may be useful for treating tumours without requiring movement of the applicator, and therefore reduce the amount of time for a successful treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207