MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1677264895 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v56i5.429

Pharmacist Performance of the DIE Test to Assess Aminoglycoside Vestibulotoxicity

2003· article· en· W1677264895 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Denise Carr, Karen Shalansky, Fawziah Marra, Art Mallinson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContraindicationTest (biology)Medical prescriptionPharmacistPediatricsPharmacyFamily medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background: Aminoglycoside antibiotics can cause irreversible vestibulotoxicity, leading to debilitating effects on balance and vision. The dynamic illegible E (DIE) test was developed at the authors’ institution to screen for signs of vestibulotoxicity and hence to prevent permanent vestibular damage; the test is currently conducted by a neurophysiologist. Objective: The primary goal of this study was to determine whether a pharmacist can perform the DIE test for vestibulotoxicity with accuracy equivalent to that of the neurophysiologist. The secondary goals were to determine the workload associated with conducting the DIE test and to correlate patient characteristics with occurrence of vestibulotoxicity. Methods: All patients starting aminoglycoside therapy over a 12-week period were screened. All patients older than 18 years of age and receiving a prescription for aminoglycoside therapy for more than 7 days were evaluated for suitability to undergo a DIE test. Patients were excluded if they were unable to sit up for the test, were unable to read at least the top 4 rows of the test chart (because of either visual impairment or mental incompetence), had a language barrier without a translator available, or had a medical contraindication to neck manipulation. Eligible patients were tested first by 1 of 2 pharmacists and were then retested, within 72 h, by the neurophysiologist. Results: A total of 213 patients were screened, of whom 38 were to receive aminoglycosides for more than 7 days. Fifteen of these patients were excluded because of a medical condition or discharge from the hospital before testing, and the remaining 23 were tested by a pharmacist. The neurophysiologist was unable to retest 7 of these patients, and 1 patient was tested twice; therefore, 16 patients and 17 DIE test results were included in the final analysis. The correlation between the results of the pharmacist and those of the neurophysiologist was 100%. There were no positive test results (score of 3 or more); therefore, no patients with vestibulotoxicity were identified. No aminoglycoside concentrations were considered supratherapeutic, and there were no changes in baseline patient characteristics such as serum creatinine or urea (as blood urea nitrogen). The DIE test took less than 3 min per patient. On average, only 2 or 3 patients would require this test each week, and hence the increase in pharmacist workload would be minimal. Conclusion: Pharmacists were able to perform the DIE test with equivalent accuracy to the control tester in patients who did not display vestibulotoxicity caused by aminoglycoside therapy. RESUME Historique : Les aminosides peuvent causer une vestibulotoxicite permanente, qui entraine des effets debilitants sur l’equilibre et la vision. Le test du «E illisible dynamique» (EID) a ete mis au point par l’etablissement auquel sont associes les auteurs, pour depister les signes de vestibulotoxicite et ainsi prevenir toute atteinte permanente du vestibule; ce test est actuellement administre par un neurophysiologiste. Objectif : Le principal objectif de cette etude etait de determiner si un pharmacien pouvait administrer le test EID et obtenir des resultats aussi precis que ceux du neurophysiologiste. Les objectifs secondaires etaient de determiner la charge de travail associee a l’administration de ce test et d’etablir une correlation entre les caracteristiques du patient et l’apparition de vestibulotoxicite. Methodes : Tous les patients qui amorcaient un traitement aux aminosides sur une periode de 12 semaines ont ete evalues. On a ensuite determine si les patients de plus de 18 ans qui recevaient une ordonnance pour un traitement de plus de sept jours aux aminosides etaient aptes a subir le test EID. Les patients etaient exclus s’ils etaient incapables de s’asseoir, de lire les quatre premieres lignes du tableau d’optotypes (a cause d’un trouble visuel ou d’incapacite mentale), de s’exprimer sans l’aide d’un interprete ou si une manipulation cervicale etait medicalement contre-indiquee. Le test a ete administre une premiere fois aux patients admissibles par l’un de deux pharmaciens, puis a nouveau 72 heures plus tard par le neurophysiologiste. Resultats : Au total, 213 patients ont ete evalues, dont 38 devaient recevoir un traitement de plus de sept jours aux aminosides. De ces 38 patients, 15 ont ete exclus a cause de leur etat de sante ou parce qu’ils avaient recu leur conge avant l’administration du test; les 23 autres ont ete examines par un pharmacien. Le neurophysiologiste n’a pu faire subir le test a 7 de ces 23 patients et a fait subir le test deux fois a un patient; c’est pourquoi l’analyse finale compte 16 patients et 17 resultats de test. On a pu etablir une correlation entre les resultats du pharmacien et ceux du neurophysiologiste dans 100 % des cas. Il n’y a eu aucun resultat positif au test (score de trois ou plus); par consequent, aucun patient n’etait atteint de vestibulotoxicite. Aucune concentration serique d’aminosides n’a ete consideree comme supratherapeutique et on n’a note aucune modification des parametres initiaux, comme la creatininemie ou l’azotemie. Il a fallu moins de trois minutes par patient pour administrer le test EID. En moyenne, il faudrait administrer ce test a seulement deux ou trois patients par semaine, pour une augmentation minime de la charge de travail du pharmacien. Conclusion : Les pharmaciens ont pu administrer le test EID de facon aussi precise que le controleur temoin chez les patients exempts de vestibulotoxicite consecutive au traitement aux aminosides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207