MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1678067964 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286217

Dynamic phasor modeling of type 3 DFIG wind generators (including SSCI phenomenon) for short circuit calculations

2015· article· en· W1678067964 on OpenAlexaff
Sriram Chandrasekar, Ramakrishna Gokaraju

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhasorControl theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Transient (computer programming)Computer scienceGenerator (circuit theory)Series (stratigraphy)Induction generatorWind powerEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectric power systemElectrical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. The short circuit contribution of a Type 3 wind farm connected to a series compensated line is affected by subsynchronous interactions making it essential to model such behavior. Fundamental frequency models are unable to represent the majority of critical wind generator fault characteristics. The complete electromagnetic transient (EMT) models, though accurate, demand high levels of computation and modeling expertise. This paper proposes a novel modeling technique based on the generalized averaging theory, where system variables are represented using time varying Fourier coefficients known as dynamic phasors. The proposed modeling technique does not just include 60 Hz frequencies but also other dominant frequencies such as 36 Hz present due to the SSCI in the system. Methods currently used by the industry mostly rely on fundamental frequency based analysis. Only the appropriate dynamic phasors are selected for the required fault behavior to be represented. Once the SSCI behavior (waveforms showing resonant frequency at Point of Common Coupling) of a series compensated Type 3 wind farm from a real time field data is available, the developed model could be used to simulate the scenario without necessarily having to know the exact control blocks of the wind generator controls. A 450 MW Type 3 wind farm consisting of 150 units was modeled using the proposed approach. The method is shown to be accurate for balanced and unbalanced faults as well as for non-fundamental frequency components present in fault currents during sub-synchronous interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207