MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1678544757

LA PENA DE EXILIO EN LA LEGISLACIÓN HISPANOGODA

2006· article· es· W1678544757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Legal History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImprisonmentPunishment (psychology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)LawMeaning (existential)SociologyPolitical scienceHistoryCriminologyHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychologyEpistemologyArchaeologyAestheticsSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo trata de seguir la evolución del concepto de exsilium como pena judicial y penal a lo largo del periodo visigodo, que cambia de sentido y significado paralelamente a la generalización de la antropología monástica en ese periodo y a la progresiva fusión de los ámbitos terrenal y espiritual en la sociedad hispanogoda. El exsilium se convierte así en una reclusión de tipo penitencial en un monasterio. Ese cambio se produce en dos etapas: Adopción por parte de los legisladores de un castigo eclesiástico, la reclusión en un monasterio, como pena judicial sobre laicos, a mediados del siglo VI. Adopción por parte de los legisladores eclesiásticos de un término judicial vacío de sentido en el mundo monástico, el exsilium, para referirse a la reclusión penitencial en un monasterio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it