MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1678749519 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1010.1524

Real-Time Multi-path Tracking of Probabilistic Available Bandwidth

2010· preprint· en· W1678749519 on OpenAlexaff
Frederic Thouin, Mark Coates, Michael Rabbat

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicPlanetLabBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingOverhead (engineering)ProvisioningDynamic Bayesian networkPath (computing)Computer networkAlgorithmBayesian probabilityThe InternetArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applications such as traffic engineering and network provisioning can greatly benefit from knowing, in real time, what is the largest input rate at which it is possible to transmit on a given path without causing congestion. We consider a probabilistic formulation for available bandwidth where the user specifies the probability of achieving an output rate almost as large as the input rate. We are interested in estimating and tracking the network-wide probabilistic available bandwidth (PAB) on multiple paths simultaneously with minimal overhead on the network. We propose a novel framework based on chirps, Bayesian inference, belief propagation and active sampling to estimate the PAB. We also consider the time evolution of the PAB by forming a dynamic model and designing a tracking algorithm based on particle filters. We implement our method in a lightweight and practical tool that has been deployed on the PlanetLab network to do online experiments. We show through these experiments and simulations that our approach outperforms block-based algorithms in terms of input rate cost and probability of successful transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.112 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207