Les diatomées de la mer de Goldthwait dans la région de Rivière-du-Loup, Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sédiments de la mer de Goldthwait de la région de Rivière-du-Loup ont livré une flore de diatomées subarctique comprenant 41 genres et 131 taxons. Cette micro-flore fossile se distingue de la flore actuelle par la rareté des espèces dulcicoles planctoniques, par l'abondance des formes polyhalobes méioeuryhalines et par le nombre restreint (32) de taxons communs. Les basses teneurs en valves des dépôts étudiés (<1 x 106valves par gramme) résultent surtout d'une biomasse médiocre accentuée par une forte sédimentation détritique. Un premier assemblage à Stephanopyxis turris var. intermedia et Coscinodiscus sp. 1 est attribué aux eaux profondes et salées de la phase pléni-marine. Le deuxième assemblage, défini par Cocconeis scutellum var. stauroneiformis, C. costata, Nitzschia cylindrus et Chaetoceros sp. 1 (soie), indique un milieu littoral et suggère que des conditions régressives moins profondes et moins salées ont pu prévaloir vers 10 500 ans BP. Le dernier assemblage marin à C. costata, Cyclotella caspia et C. scutellum var. stauroneiformis correspond à un milieu saumâtre et peu profond qui a pu exister localement durant la phase régressive. Les quelques diatomées tourbicoles relevées dans des sédiments marins suggère enfin une installation de la flore continentale dès 10 500 ans BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".