MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1679028075 · doi:10.3917/aco.041.70

La Grande Peur dans la montagne de C. F. Ramuz ou la naissance d'une légende

2006· article· fr· W1679028075 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Berney

Bibliographic record

VenueA contrario · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Analysis and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Ramuz s’est passionné pour les légendes alpines et il s’en est inspiré dans de nombreux textes. Cet article examine le cas de La Grande Peur dans la montagne (1926), en montrant que le roman est traversé par plusieurs lieux communs légendaires, comme le chasseur diabolique et le purgatoire glaciaire où errent les âmes des damnés. À l’instar de certaines nouvelles de Maupassant, le personnage principal de La Grande Peur, Joseph, est confronté à des événements surnaturels qui le font progressivement dériver dans un univers onirique, fantastique, voire fantasmatique. Par ailleurs, la fin du roman, du moins dans l’édition originale, peut laisser à penser que l’ensemble du récit est une légende.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA contrarioSame topicLiterary Analysis and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207