MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1679694671 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2000.849586

Options analysis of the Canadian forces public key infrastructure

2002· article· en· W1679694671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Strategy and Technology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic key infrastructureComputer securityPublic-key cryptographyAuthentication (law)IPsecKey (lock)ConfidentialityComputer scienceNon-repudiationPublic key certificateSoftware deploymentCryptographyComputer networkInternet privacyThe InternetEncryptionWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A public key infrastructure (PKI) provides security services such as confidentiality, authentication, and nonrepudiation for communications protocols. SSL, IPsec and S/MIME use certificates provided by a PKI for real-time secure messaging, the essential service for electronic transactions. While it is a relatively straight-forward exercise to build a PKI on a LAN, this paper examines the issues associated with the more complicated PKI deployment on the Canadian forces' Defence Wide Area Network (DWAN).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilitary Strategy and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207