Bibliographic record
Abstract
The raised bog area in the east of the province of Groningen became settled during the 12th century, judging by our present knowledge of the building date s of churches in the area. As a result of shrinking (and oxidation) of the peat surface, drainage became more and more problematical. In the end the area had to be abandoned in the 15th/early 16th century. Shortly afterwards the land was inundated by the sea, creating thereby the so-called Dollard. The former villages were covered by a thick layer of marine clay. The land was reclaimed from the second half of the 16th century on. The old churchyard of the swallowed village of Scheemda was excavated in 1988 and 1989, preceeding roadconstruction activities. Two cruciform groundplans of stone built churches were uncovered, dating from the first and third or fourth quarter of the 13th century. The walls of the first church had been founded partly up sand, partly up peat. Shrinking of the peat must have caused severe problems, so that it had to be replaced by a new building situated on a churchyard surrounded by wall and ditch. The archaeological finds consisted mostly of ceramics, especially Kugeltopf pottery decorated with applied ribbons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".