Le groupe surréaliste de Bucarest entre Paris et Bruxelles, 1945-1947 : une page d’histoire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé : 
 Le conflit qui eut lieu en 1947, par voie épistolaire et à coup d’expositions, entre—d’une part—le groupe surréaliste de Bucarest et le peintre surréaliste bruxellois, René Magritte, et—d’autre part—celui-ci et André Breton, chef de file du groupe surréaliste de Paris, est considéré ici comme révélateur d’une des multiples tensions qui ont traversé le mouvement surréaliste international. Au lendemain de la seconde guerre mondiale, par l’affrontement de sensibilités divergentes et de rhétoriques fort marquées, ce bref épisode témoigne d’un des moments les plus névralgiques de l’histoire européenne. En reconstituant cet épisode à partir du groupe bucarestois, encore peu connu, l’article le présente aux lecteurs. 
 
 Mots-clés : Surréalisme, Infra-Noir, Gherasim Luca, Paul Păun, Victor Brauner, Seconde guerre mondiale, André Breton, René Magritte, amentalisme, 1947
 
 Abstract: 
 The conflict waged in 1947, through letters and exhibitions, between the surrealist group of Bucharest and the Belgian surrealist painter, René Magritte on the one hand, and, on the other, Magritte and André Breton, the leading figure of the French surrealist group, is being considered here as typical of the multiplicity of tensions that traversed the international surrealist movement. In the aftermath of the second world war, this conflict bears witness, through the confrontation of divergent sensibilities and strong rhetoric, to one of the most nevralgic moments of European history. By reconstituting this episode from the position of the little-known Bucharest group, the article introduces it to the readers. 
 
 Key words: Surrealism, Gherasim Luca, Paul Păun, Victor Brauner, World War II, André Breton, René Magritte, Amentalism, 1947
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it