MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1680826874 · doi:10.1109/aps.2005.1552703

A Fourier Expansion Solution to Plane Wave Scattering from Isosceles Right Triangle Groove in Perfect Conducting Plane

2005· article· en· W1680826874 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha, Arati Pai, S.K. Chaudhuri, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgilent Technologies
KeywordsScatteringIsosceles triangleGroove (engineering)DiffractionPlane (geometry)OpticsPlane waveFourier seriesPhysicsField (mathematics)Fourier transformGeometryMathematicsMathematical analysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While scattering from a rectangular groove, or rectangular slit, in a perfectly conducting plane has been studied extensively, an analytical solution for the scattering problem from an isosceles right triangle (IRT) groove in a perfectly conducting plane has not yet been found. The triangle groove is of practical use in optical and microwave diffraction. An exact analytical solution for the scattering of a plane wave from an IRT groove in a perfectly conducting plane is presented. The spectrum of the scattered fields is expressed as a Fourier expansion related to the field in the groove. Near and far fields can be determined by this presentation of the scattered field in series form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207