MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1681418886 · doi:10.1111/geb.12172

Global relationship of wood and leaf litter decomposability: the role of functional traits within and across plant organs

2014· article· en· W1681418886 on OpenAlex
Katherina A. Pietsch, Kiona Ogle, Johannes H. C. Cornelissen, William K. Cornwell, Gerhard Bönisch, Joseph M. Craine, Benjamin G. Jackson, Jens Kattge, Duane A. Peltzer, Josep Peñuelas, Peter B. Reich, David A. Wardle, James T. Weedon, Ian J. Wright, Amy E. Zanne, Christian Wirth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAustralian Research CouncilMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologyPlant litterLitterSpecific leaf areaBotanyRange (aeronautics)Woody plantEcosystemEcologyPhotosynthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Recent meta‐analyses have revealed that plant traits and their phylogenetic history influence decay rates of dead wood and leaf litter, but it remains unknown if decay rates of wood and litter covary over a wide range of tree species and across ecosystems. We evaluated the relationships between species‐specific wood and leaf litter decomposability, as well as between wood and leaf traits that control their respective decomposability. Location Global. Methods We compiled data on rates of wood and leaf litter decomposition for 324 and 635 tree species, respectively, and data on six functional traits for both organs. We used hierarchical Bayesian meta‐analysis to estimate, for the first time, species‐specific values for wood and leaf litter decomposability standardized to reference conditions ( k * wood and k * leaf ) across the globe. With these data, we evaluated the relationships: (1) between wood and leaf traits, (2) between each k * and the selected traits within and across organs, and (3) between wood and leaf k *. Results Across all species k * wood and k * leaf were positively correlated, phylogenetically clustered and correlated with plant functional traits within and across organs. k * of both organs was usually better described as a function of within‐ and cross‐organ traits, than of within‐organ traits alone. When analysed for angiosperms and gymnosperms separately, wood and leaf k * were no longer significantly correlated, but each k * was still significantly correlated to the functional traits. Main conclusions We demonstrate important relationships among wood and leaf litter decomposability as after‐life effects of traits from the living plants. These functional traits influence the decomposability of senesced tissue which could potentially lead to alterations in the rates of biogeochemical cycling, depending on the phylogenetic structure of the species pool. These results provide crucial information for a better representation of decomposition rates in dynamic global vegetation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it