Escolitinos y platipodinos (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) atraídos a trampas tipo NTP-80 en Zapotitlán de las Salinas, Puebla, México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se realizó el estudio de fauna de la escolitinos y platipodinos en una zona semiárida de Zapotitlán de las Salinas, Puebla, México. Se realizaron muestreos mensuales durante un año, de abril de 1998 a marzo de 1999, empleando trampas de tipo NTP-80 cebadas con calamar. El líquido conservador compuesto de ácido acético y alcohol, sirvió como atrayente para estos grupos. Las trampas fueron distribuidas en cinco localidades (cactáceas columnares, mezquital de terrazas, mezquital ribereño, mezquital no fragmentado y una vegetación no alterada). Se capturaron 328 individuos, cinco especies de Scolytinae y una de Platypodinae. Se registraron por primera vez para el estado de Puebla a Premnobius cavipennis Eichhoff, 1878, Xyleborus posticus Eichhoff, 1869, Monarthrum pennatum Wood y Bright, 1992 y Euplatypus parallelus (Fabricius, 1801). La mayor abundancia y riqueza de especies fue observada en el mezquital ribereño y la presencia de estos grupos de Curculionidae de forma abundante al final de la época de lluvias, lo que podría estar asociado con la disponibilidad de recursos en tiempo y espacio. Este estudio contribuye de manera importante al conocimiento de los escolitinos y platipodinos del estado de Puebla, México.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".