Avaliação de alexitimia, neuroticismo e depressão em dependentes de álcool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The object of this study was to investigate the levels of alexithymia, neuroticism and depression in a male sample (N=40) composed of a group of alcohol dependent outpatiens (G1) (N=20), and one of non-dependents (G2)(N=20), members of the community. The participants' assessment was achieved with the Portuguese version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Neuroticism/Emotional Adjustment Factorial Scale and the Depression Beck Inventory. Results pointed to significantly higher mean scores of alexithymia, neuroticism and depressions in G1 compared to G2. According to measures of severity, high levels of alexithymia and depression were associated with the G1 participants. Concerning the neuroticism, the normal level predominated similarly to the G2. Significant correlations between neuroticism and depression (p<0,001), alexithymia and neuroticism (p<0,001), as well as between alexithymia and depression (p<0,01) were viewed as evidence of the scales concurrent validity. Some methodological limitations were identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".