State of the art for enhancing the blast resistance of reinforced concrete columns with fiber-reinforced plastic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protective design has become a chief concern in the design of some bridges and buildings, particularly related to the requirement that such facilities offer protection from accidental or malicious explosions. In this paper, the enhancement of the blast-resistance capability of reinforced concrete columns using FRP (fiber-reinforced plastic) is examined as a key element in upgrading the protective design of existing buildings and bridges. In this paper, the basic behaviors that need to be considered in blast effects analysis of RC columns for vehicle bomb threats are described. The ability of FRP to address these sorts of risks is shown through the analysis and test results presented. Three crucial points are made: (1) FRP offers a remarkable capability to enhance the blast resistance of existing RC columns, (2) assessing the residual capacity of large columns struck by a blast loading involves consideration of the effects of material damage, and (3) physics-based material models are often needed to capture the concrete behaviors engendered by intense blast loads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it