MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1682899846 · doi:10.1029/2010gl043989

Non‐stormtime injection of energetic particles into the slot‐region between Earth's inner and outer electron radiation belts as observed by STSAT‐1 and NOAA‐POES

2010· article· en· W1682899846 on OpenAlexaff
Jaeheung Park, Kyung-Won Min, Danny Summers, Junga Hwang, Hee-Jeong Kim, R. B. Horne, Peter Kirsch, K. Yumoto, Т. Уозуми, H. Lühr, J. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsSubstormVan Allen radiation beltGeomagnetic stormElectronVan Allen ProbesEarth's magnetic fieldStormPhysicsRadiationGeophysicsSatelliteAtmospheric sciencesGeologyMeteorologyMagnetic fieldMagnetosphereAstronomyNuclear physicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The slot‐region between Earth's inner and outer electron radiation belts was observed on 24 February 2004 by the satellite STSAT‐1 to be populated by quasi‐trapped electrons of energy 100‐400 keV. This injection lasted for several hours and took place during a non‐stormtime substorm. This appears to be the first observation of a slot‐region electron injection that did not occur during a geomagnetic storm. We also report multi‐instrument observations of this event from NOAA‐POES and CPMN magnetic observatories, and we consider physical mechanisms that may account for the phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→