MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1682925717 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.031801

Improved Measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>Branching Ratio

2004· article· lv· W1682925717 on OpenAlexaff
V. V. Anisimovsky, A. Artamonov, B. Bassalleck, B. Bhuyan, E. W. Blackmore, D. Bryman, S. Chen, I-H. Chiang, I. A. Christidi, P. S. Cooper, M. Diwan, J. S. Frank, Takeshi Fujiwara, J. F. Hu, A. Ivashkin, D. E. Jaffe, S. Kabe, S. H. Kettell, M. Khabibullin, A. N. Khotjantsev, P. Kitching, M. Kobayashi, T. K. Komatsubara, A. Konaka, А. П. Кожевников, Y. Kudenko, A. Kushnirenko, L.G. Landsberg, B. Lewis, K. K. Li, L. Littenberg, J. A. Macdonald, J. Mildenberger, O. V. Mineev, M. Miyajima, K. Mizouchi, V.A. Mukhin, N. Muramatsu, T. Nakano, M. Nomachi, T. Nomura, T. Numao, V. Obraztsov, K. Omata, D. I. Patalakha, S. V. Petrenko, R. Poutissou, E. J. Ramberg, G. Redlinger, Takahiro Sato, T. Sekiguchi, T. Shinkawa, R. C. Strand, S. Sugimoto, Y. Tamagawa, R. Tschirhart, T. Tsunemi, D. V. Vavilov, N. Yershov, Y. Yoshimura, T. Yoshioka

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNational laboratoryBranching fractionNuclear physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Particle physicsChemistryEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An additional event near the upper kinematic limit for ${K}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$ has been observed by experiment E949 at Brookhaven National Laboratory. Combining previously reported and new data, the branching ratio is $\mathcal{B}({K}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}\ensuremath{\nu}\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}})=({1.47}_{\ensuremath{-}0.89}^{+1.30})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}$ based on three events observed in the pion momentum region $211&lt;P&lt;229\text{ }\mathrm{M}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}/c$. At the measured central value of the branching ratio, the additional event had a signal-to-background ratio of 0.9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations143
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207