MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1683124040 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1999.780157

Constrained circuit optimization via library table genetic algorithms

2003· article· en· W1683124040 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGenetic algorithmTable (database)Set (abstract data type)AlgorithmConstruct (python library)Electronic circuitPower (physics)Function (biology)Mathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic Algorithms (GAs) are presented as a robust method of obtaining optimal or near-optimal solutions to circuit optimization problems. Circuits which must contain devices from a constrained "parts library" are shown to be particularly well-suited for optimization by genetic algorithms. As a practical example of the optimization method, a genetic algorithm implementation was used to optimize a Gilbert Cell mixer with respect to several competing metrics. The simulated power consumption, mixer gain, and IP3 of the mixer were used to construct a cost function. This cost function measure was minimized by the GA, producing several alternative Gilbert Cell mixers as outputs. The solution set was constrained to contain devices chosen from a library of previously characterized MOSFETs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207