Controversies in Sexual Medicine: Is Physical Examination Required Before Prescribing Hormones to Patients with Gender Dysphoria?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A genital examination can have psychologic effects on a patient, particularly when the source of their sexual medicine complaint is a body part. How necessary is a physical exam before prescribing hormones in cases of gender dsyphoria? METHODS: Five people with expertise and/or interest in the area of gender dysphoria and endocrinology were asked to contribute their opinions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: To provide food for thought, discussion, and possible further research in a poorly discussed area of sexual medicine. RESULTS: Of the five experts writing on the topic, one believes that a physical examination should always be performed before prescribing hormones for gender dysphoria, one believes it is not a prerequisite, and three believe a physical examination is recommended, but is not necessary in cases where the patient objects despite an explanation of the purpose of the exam. As long as this was documented, it would not present a medicolegal problem. CONCLUSIONS: It is not clear whether or not a physical examination must be performed on all gender dsyphoric patients before prescribing hormones; however, an examination would be helpful in revealing a significant health management issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.081 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".