Unusual Cellular Disposition of the Mitochondrial Molecular Chaperones Hsp60, Hsp70 and Hsp10
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of molecular chaperones in mammalian cells are localized in mitochondria and they are presumed to function mainly within this organelle. However, there is now compelling evidence that these chaperones are also localized at a variety of other sites/compartments in cells where they perform important functions. These proteins include: (i) the major chaperonin Hsp60 (or P1), which was identified in mammalian cells as a protein altered in mutants resistant to microtubule inhibitors and is involved in numerous functions at the cell surface and in other compartments; (ii) the Hspl0 or Cpn10 protein, which is a co-chaperone for Hsp60 in protein folding but also serves as an early pregnancy factor in maternal serum; and (iii) the mHsp70 protein, which plays a central role in mitochondrial protein import but is also important for cellular senescence (mortalin) and antigen presentation processes. The presence of these mitochondrial chaperones at specific extramitochondrial locations greatly broadens the range of functions that they can carry out in cells. However, these observations also raise important questions regarding the mechanisms by which these proteins reach these extramitochondrial locations. My paper will review some work in this area and discuss the significance of these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".