Was is there or was it here?: transcultural visions in Marlene Nourbese Philip's early poetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN La dinamica de aculturacion versus deculturacion que describia de forma simplista el transito de una formacion cultural a otra fue reemplazada en el ultimo cuarto del siglo XX por el estudio de como la transferencia cultural crea un continuo personal y experiencial. En Canada, la literatura producida por autores inmigrantes esta particularmente interesada en los procesos transculturales subyacentes en la construccion del sujeto. Este articulo explora la poesia temprana de la autora canadiense de origen afrocaribeno Marlene Nourbese Philip con el fin de revelar que Thorns (1980) y Salmon Courage (1983) son un ejemplo de ese continuo transcultural. Ademas, en ambas colecciones, el transito entre culturas es paralelo a la articulacion de localizaciones provisionales que minan el estatismo de los discursos centrados de nacion y estado. Con la conciencia de surgir de la zona de contacto y el intersticio, la poesia de Philip aparece incapaz de decidirse por un asentamiento facil, mientras favorece en su lugar la movilidad, la inestabilidad y los espacios cambiantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".