MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Network ages: The Text is Originally Diverse Development of Theoretical Writing

2010· article· en· W1685575963 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jin Zhen-bang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetRealmSubject (documents)Space (punctuation)Transformative learningPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceSociologyNew mediaEpistemologyMedia studiesMathematics educationWorld Wide WebMathematicsPolitical scienceArtificial intelligencePedagogyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of the Internet Age, the text writing theory has entered a critical transforming period. New ways of thinking and new concepts brought by the new media of the Internet are leading a revolution in the realm of writing. The traditional text writing theory has become somewhat speechless on the Internet, trapped in a crisis of being deconstructed and reorganized. A diversified form of writing theory of the Internet Age is developing, whose complementary structure of research perspective, diversified trend of theory system and the new space of the subject have presented us with a rather attractive new academic study dimension. The long-term coexistence of the real world and the cyber space will see a parallel development of traditional and modern ways of text writing theories with interactions through harmonious tensions. This paper mainly discussed the following three issues: First, the new Internet media has led to a revolution in the writing arena. The form of medium itself contains enormous transformative force, thus the revolution in the writing arena caused by the new Internet media. Second, the writing on the computer is exerting impact on the traditional text writing theory. The writing topic and content have shifted from single, concentrated ones towards diversified ones; the linear plane structure has been shifted to the network structure; the singular media writing skill is replaced with multi-media ways. The pre-setting of the acceptance theory: the passive outlook of passengers and the selective outlook of the driver; the static materials of the limited space and the dynamic materials of the limitless cyberspace. A differentiated new network linguistic form is emerging from the traditional form. The Internet literal style is breaking down the pattern of the traditional literal style. The traditional literature creation theory is facing a challenge from the Internet literature. Third, the text writing theory of the Internet Age is been diversified. The writing perspectives are confronting and complementing with each other; the theoretical system has been diversified; new space has been created by the subject. Key words: the Internet Age, Text writing theory, Multi-diversification Resume: A l’epoque de l’internet , la theorie de redaction des textes est train d’evoluer . Les nouvelles pensees et idees apportees par les neomass media de l’internet donnent lieu a une revolution dans le milieu de composition . La theorie traditionnelle de redaction doit faire face a la decomposition et la restructuration . Une nouvelle theorie pluraliste de redaction est en train de se relever . La tendance du pluralisme du systeme theorique et l’espace marginale des sujets de recherche nous presentent les milieus tres attirants d’etudes academiques . En raison de la longue coexistence du monde reel et l’espace de l’internet , les poles moderne et traditionnel de la theorie de redaction se developperont ensemble pour montrer une force d’expansion harmonieuse en interaction . Cette memoire traite principalement ces trois problemes suivants : premierement , le neomass media aboutit a une revolution dans le domaine de redaction ; deuxiemement , la theorie de la redaction avec l’ordinateur ebranle celle de redation traditionnelle ; enfin , C’est la tendance du pluralisme de la theorie de redaction des textes a l’epoque de l’internet Mots-cles: l’epoque de l’internet , la theorique de redaction des textes , la fission pluraliste 摘要:進入網路時代,文本寫作理論處於極為重要的轉型期。網路新媒體帶來的新思維、新觀念正在引發寫作領域的革命。傳統的文本寫作理論在網路空間患了某種失語症,正面臨解構和重組。網路時代一種多元化的文本寫作理論正在崛起,其研究視角的互補結構、理論體系的多元走向和課題探索的邊緣空間,為我們展現出極為誘人的新的學術研究領地。由於現實世界和網路空間將長期並存,因此,文本寫作理論的傳統和現代兩極將並行發展,在互動中呈現出某種和諧的張力。本篇論文主要論述了以下三個問題:一、網路新媒體引發了寫作領域的革命。媒介形式本身潛藏著巨大的變革力量。網路新媒體引發了寫作領域的革命。二、電腦寫作衝擊傳統文本寫作理論。單一集中的主題,趨向主題內涵呈現的多指向。線性的平面佈局到非線性的網路式立體結構。單一媒體的表達技巧到多媒體的複合呈現。接受理論預設:乘客的被動性視野和駕駛員的選擇性視野。有限空間的靜態材料到無限網路的動態材料。在傳統語言形態中生髮出變異的網路新語言形態。網路文體正在消解傳統文體的格局和界線。傳統文學創作理論在網路文學面前面臨挑戰。三、網路時代文本寫作理論的多元化走向。寫作視角的對立互補。理論體系的多元走向。課題探索的邊緣空間。 關鍵詞:網路時代;文本寫作理論;多元裂變

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0160.031
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207