MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1685749731 · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v8i3.518

Vector Exponential Models and Second Order Inference

2012· article· en· W1685749731 on OpenAlex
D. A. S. Fraser, Uyen Hoang, Kexin Ji, Xufei Li, Li Li, Wei Lin, Jie Su

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsExponential functionStatistical inferenceBayesian probabilityQuantileApplied mathematicsInferenceStatisticsScalar (mathematics)Bayesian inferenceContext (archaeology)Taylor seriesEconometricsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE For an exponential model with scalar parameter, WelchP:1963 examined the role of Bayesian analysis in statistical inference, more specifically the use of the Jeffreys:1946 prior. They determined that Bayesian intervals and thus in effect Bayesian quantiles had second order confidence accuracy. We use a Taylor series expansion of the log-model to develop a second order version of the vector exponential model; this is developed as a contribution to theory in statistics at a time when algorithms are prominent, and it provides a basis for generalizing the Welch-Peers approach to the vector parameter context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it