MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1685749731 · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v8i3.518

Vector Exponential Models and Second Order Inference

2012· article· en· W1685749731 on OpenAlexafffund
D. A. S. Fraser, Uyen Hoang, Kexin Ji, Xufei Li, Li Li, Wei Lin, Jie Su

Bibliographic record

VenuePakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsExponential functionStatistical inferenceBayesian probabilityQuantileApplied mathematicsInferenceStatisticsScalar (mathematics)Bayesian inferenceContext (archaeology)Taylor seriesEconometricsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE For an exponential model with scalar parameter, WelchP:1963 examined the role of Bayesian analysis in statistical inference, more specifically the use of the Jeffreys:1946 prior. They determined that Bayesian intervals and thus in effect Bayesian quantiles had second order confidence accuracy. We use a Taylor series expansion of the log-model to develop a second order version of the vector exponential model; this is developed as a contribution to theory in statistics at a time when algorithms are prominent, and it provides a basis for generalizing the Welch-Peers approach to the vector parameter context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation ResearchSame topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207