MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1685824674 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.4469

External Memory Algorithms For Path Traversal in Graphs

2013· preprint· en· W1685824674 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Dillabaugh

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTree traversalGraph traversalPolygon meshData structureComputer sciencePath (computing)Representation (politics)Binary treeBounded functionPlanar graphTree (set theory)Longest path problemAlgorithmShortest path problemTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsGraphCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents a number of results related to path traversal in trees and graphs. In particular, we focus on data structures which allow such traversals to be performed efficiently in the external memory setting. In addition, for trees and planar graphs the data structures we present are succinct. Our tree structures permit efficient bottom-up path traversal in rooted trees of arbitrary degree and efficient top-down path traversal in binary trees. In the graph setting, we permit efficient traversal of an arbitrary path in bounded degree planar graphs. Our data structures for both trees and graphs match or slightly improve current best results for external memory path traversal in these settings while at the same time improving space bounds due to the succinct nature of our data structures. Employing our path traversal structure for bounded degree planar graphs, we describe a number of useful applications of this technique for triangular meshes in R^2. As an extension of the R^2 representation for triangular meshes we also present an efficient external memory representation for well-shaped tetrahedral meshes in R^3. The external memory representation we present is based on a partitioning scheme that matches the current best-known results for well-shaped tetrahedral meshes. We describe applications of path traversal in tetrahedral meshes which are made efficient in the external memory setting using our structure. Finally, we present a result on using jump-and-walk point location in well-shaped meshes in both R^2 and R^3. We demonstrate that, given an approximate nearest neighbour from among the vertices of a mesh, locating the simplex containing the query point involves a constant length walk (path traversal) in the mesh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.125 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207