Médecine, comparaisons et échanges inter-impériaux dans le mandat camerounais : une histoire croisée franco-allemande de la mission Jamot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde un épisode bien connu de l’histoire sanitaire du Cameroun: le programme de lutte contre la maladie du sommeil du Dr Eugène Jamot. Il étudie à partir de ce cas comment la médecine fut simultanément, dans le contexte mandataire, un enjeu patriotique et le lieu d’une internationalisation des pratiques et des débats coloniaux. En s’appuyant sur les propositions théoriques de l’histoire croisée, l’article replace le parcours de Jamot au sein d’un chassé-croisé entre médecins allemands et français, qui se succèdent au Cameroun suite à la Première Guerre mondiale. Ce croisement est l’occasion de transferts techniques et de comparaisons internationales. S’entrelacent ainsi l’histoire allemande de la médecine coloniale française, l’histoire médicale du mandat camerounais et l’histoire postcoloniale de la médecine tropicale allemande, qui se redéploie en Europe après 1918.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".