Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'auteur s'attache à rendre intelligible l'ensemble des interventions publiques qui ont, sur près de quarante années (1945-1981), structuré les rapports entre vieillesse et société. Pour l'essentiel, les interventions de l'État se sont organisées autour de trois axes majeurs: retraite, mode de vie et emploi. Une approche synthétique de la politique publique française permet de distinguer trois périodes correspondant à trois formes distinctes de combinaison de ces dimensions. La recomposition du jeu des forces sociales antagonistes ou complémentaires qui a constitué la matrice des interventions publiques dans chaque cas permet de mettre en évidence que les modes de gestion publique de la vieillesse reflètent à chaque moment historique la forme d'articulation, en perpétuelle tension et transformation, entre l'ordre de l'Etat et l'ordre des rapports sociaux. À partir de cette mise à jour des systèmes d'action qui sont au cœur de la formation et de l'évolution des politiques de la vieillesse, l'auteur essaie, en conclusion, d'identifier certains des mécanismes qui ont engendré ce que nous désignons aujourd'hui comme la crise de l'État-Providence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".