MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1687818993 · doi:10.1002/navi.9

Phase Prediction Method in GNSS Receivers with Application to Phase Reacquisition

2012· article· en· W1687818993 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Xie, Mark G. Petovello

Bibliographic record

VenueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsPhase (matter)Computer scienceStatisticsEnvironmental scienceMathematicsGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this work is to reduce the carrier phase reacquisition time using a phase prediction method in the standard and advanced receiver architectures. In the phase prediction approach, carrier phase measurements are predicted for satellites that have lost lock by integrating the estimated Doppler computed from the navigation solution. In so doing, the predicted phase error is typically accurate enough to yield significant improvements in phase reacquisition times. Predicted phase quality is evaluated and all algorithms are tested using real data collected under mild to moderate operational conditions. Standard, vector-based, and ultra-tight architectures are considered. Copyright © 2012 Institute of Navigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of NavigationSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207