Dopamine versus no treatment to prevent renal dysfunction in indomethacin-treated preterm newborn infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indomethacin therapy for closure of patent ductus arteriosus frequently causes oliguria, and occasionally more serious renal dysfunction. Low dose dopamine has been suggested as a means for preventing this side effect. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dopamine therapy may prevent indomethacin-mediated deterioration in renal function in the preterm newborn infant without serious adverse effects. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of dopamine on the above variables in two subgroups: (1) patients given indomethacin as prophylaxis of intraventricular hemorrhage, and (2) patients given indomethacin as treatment of patent ductus arteriosus SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) were used. We searched MEDLINE (1966-2001) using PubMed as the search engine, EMBASE (1974-2001) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) from the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2001). In addition we contacted the principal investigators if necessary to ascertain the required information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized studies of the effects of dopamine on urine output, glomerular filtration rate, fluid balance or incidence of renal failure, in preterm newborn infants receiving indomethacin. The comparison group should have received no dopamine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and those of the CNRG. The primary outcomes of interest were: mortality before discharge; intraventricular hemorrhage, grade three or four; cystic periventricular leukomalacia; renal failure (either oliguria, defined as a urine output less than 1 ml/kg/hour or an elevation in creatinine by more than 40 micromoles/L); failure to close the ductus arteriosus; need for surgical PDA ligation. For categorical outcomes, we calculated typical estimates for relative risk and risk difference. For continuous outcomes the weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated. Fixed effect models were assumed for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies were found (total number randomized patients, 75) which fulfilled the entry criteria for this review. All were single center trials which enrolled NICU patients receiving indomethacin for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. There are no (or only partial) results for effects of dopamine on several of the primary outcomes, including death before discharge, serious intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, or renal failure. There has been inadequate investigation of the effects of dopamine on cerebral perfusion or cardiac output, or GI complications, or endocrine toxicity. Dopamine improved urine output [WMD 0.68 ml/kg/hour (95% CI 0.22, 1.44)], but there was no evidence of effect on serum creatinine (WMD 2.04 micromoles/liter, CI -17.90, 21.97) or the incidence of oliguria (urine output < 1 ml/kg/hour) (RR 0.73, CI 0.35, 1.54). There was no evidence of effect of dopamine on the frequency of failure to close the ductus arteriosus (RR 1.11, CI 0.56, 2.19). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomized trials to support the use of dopamine to prevent renal dysfunction in indomethacin-treated preterm infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".