MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1688817427 · doi:10.1109/drc.2001.937877

An extension of McKelvey's one-flux method to energy space

2002· article· en· W1688817427 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. McKinnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Flux (metallurgy)Space (punctuation)Boltzmann equationDiffusionPhysicsMomentum (technical analysis)Boltzmann constantStatistical physicsEnergy (signal processing)Classical mechanicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

McKelvey et al. (1961) introduced the one-flux method, based on left-going and right-going fluxes of particles, as an alternative to the drift-diffusion method in describing semiconductor devices. To study the limitations of the one-flux method, I propose an extension of the method to account for the energy of the particles. This extension, based on Bringuier's Fokker-Planck approach to the Boltzmann equation, reduces the Boltzmann equation from momentum space to energy space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207