MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1688857231

A Bayesian framework for geoacoustic inversion of wind-driven ambient noise in shallow water

2012· article· en· W1688857231 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge E. Quijano, Stan E. Dosso, Jan Dettmer

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityDiscretizationMonte Carlo methodInversion (geology)Reversible-jump Markov chain Monte CarloAcousticsMetropolis–Hastings algorithmBayesian inferenceJumpAmbient noise levelNoise (video)AlgorithmMathematicsComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayesian inversion is applied to estimate the joint posterior probability density (PPD) of geoacoustic parameters. The PPD is sampled by a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (rjMCMC) algorithm, which uses an extended Metropolis-Hasting (MH) criterion that allows trans-D jumps between parameterizations, quantifying the uncertainly due to the lack of knowledge of the model parameterization. Sequential datsets are obtained by discretizing continuous-time recordings of ambient noise. Conventional beamforming was used to estimate the BL at 8 frequencies in the range 550 Hz to 1400 Hz. The BL data at 20 uniformly-spaced grazing angles from 14° to 90° is provided to the sequential Bayesian trans-D Monte Carlo algorithm for estimation of the PPD. The geoacoustic parameters and the depth of acoustic interfaces closely resemble the true profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANU Open Research (Australian National University)Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207