MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1688857231

A Bayesian framework for geoacoustic inversion of wind-driven ambient noise in shallow water

2012· article· en· W1688857231 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge E. Quijano, Stan E. Dosso, Jan Dettmer

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityDiscretizationMonte Carlo methodInversion (geology)Reversible-jump Markov chain Monte CarloAcousticsMetropolis–Hastings algorithmBayesian inferenceJumpAmbient noise levelNoise (video)AlgorithmMathematicsComputer scienceGeologyPhysicsStatisticsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayesian inversion is applied to estimate the joint posterior probability density (PPD) of geoacoustic parameters. The PPD is sampled by a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (rjMCMC) algorithm, which uses an extended Metropolis-Hasting (MH) criterion that allows trans-D jumps between parameterizations, quantifying the uncertainly due to the lack of knowledge of the model parameterization. Sequential datsets are obtained by discretizing continuous-time recordings of ambient noise. Conventional beamforming was used to estimate the BL at 8 frequencies in the range 550 Hz to 1400 Hz. The BL data at 20 uniformly-spaced grazing angles from 14° to 90° is provided to the sequential Bayesian trans-D Monte Carlo algorithm for estimation of the PPD. The geoacoustic parameters and the depth of acoustic interfaces closely resemble the true profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANU Open Research (Australian National University)Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207