Land, Livestock and Leadership among the Ju/'hoansi San of North Western Botswana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En Afrique, les Autochtones ont eu de la difficulte a obtenir des droits stables a la terre et aux ressources. Les San Ju/'hoansi de la Republique du Botswana ont eu a lutter contre des decisions gouvernementales qui ne permettaient pas a des groupes de reclamer des droits territoriaux sur la base de coutumes ancestrales ou d'occupation prolongee. L'A. examine quelques facons ingenieuses dont les Ju/'hoansi se sont servi dans la question des terres et des droits aux ressources, y compris faire un releve detaille de leurs territoires ancestraux et se servir des politiques du gouvernement du Botswana sur l'administration communautaire des ressources naturelles pour gagner un plus grand controle des terres, de l'eau et des ressources de la flore et de la faune.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".