MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1689346920 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1993.394248

A new algorithm for training multilayer feedforward neural networks

2002· article· en· W1689346920 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao-Hu Yu, N.K. Loh, William C. Miller

Bibliographic record

Venue1993 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackpropagationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceAlgorithmFeedforward neural networkFeed forwardSigmoid functionRpropLimitingProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceTraining (meteorology)Function (biology)Probabilistic neural networkSeparable spaceTime delay neural networkTypes of artificial neural networksMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present a new learning and synthesis algorithm for training multilayer feedforward neural networks. Its principle is to synthesize a neural network by growing layers based on using training results until the required results are achieved. Each layer is trained with the pocket algorithm and hidden neurons are added only when needed. The proposed algorithm has the following properties. 1) The architecture of the network is generated dynamically by the learning process algorithm and it is unnecessary to estimate the number of layers and the number of hidden neurons before training. The neuron activation function is hard limiting instead of sigmoidal. 2) The learning speed is faster than other algorithms, especially the backpropagation algorithm. After the neural network is fully trained the system error is absolutely zero. 3) This algorithm can classify both linear separable and linear nonseparable families, whereas the backpropagation algorithm will fail sometimes. Extensive numerical simulation studies of this algorithm have confirmed these properties and thus the proposed training strategy looks promising.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1993 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and SystemsSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207